Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 30.06.2025 04:12

Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Nutritionists Reveal the Surprising Amount of Protein You Actually Need - AOL.com
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Texas, Oklahoma and Nevada make changes to lure business amid Delaware’s ‘Dexit’ concern - AP News
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
What’s next?
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
6 million Chickens Dead and Counting - Daily Kos
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Pokémon GO Events (June 23-29 2025): Global GO Fest, Regi Raids and Bottle Caps! - Pokémon GO Hub
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Thank you.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Amazon launches new R&D group focused on agentic AI and robotics - TechCrunch
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.